Village of the Damned and Children of the Damned

No time for a proper review, here are some notes:

  • Only a few years between these two movies, but what a difference! Two different worlds:
  • Village of the Damned
    • genteel (George Sanders, for God's sake)
    • bucolic (set in a picture perfect English village)
    • male supremacist (face slapping)
    • heteronormative (despite Sanderss's gay-osity)
    • traditional gothic plot (the good guys triumph)
    • a fabulous dress, with a bustle and a huge bow
  • Children of the Damned:
    • oppressive (strangely deserted London)
    • sex is confused and dangerous
      • the two main characters appear to be gay
      • the first mother is a shrieking harridan, all the other mothers are weak or otherwise problematic
      • loss of agency: the primary female character is most often an automaton
      • inability to communicate: the primary child character speaks only twice, both times briefly
      • random events are more important than character (the accident that resolves the conflict)
      • the plot is gothic stood on its head (the monsters turn out to be the good guys and we turn out to be the monsters)
    • weird plot hole: why did the children return to their embassies, only to kill and then go back to the church?